Ohio State is in the process of revising websites and program materials to accurately reflect compliance with the law. While this work occurs, language referencing protected class status or other activities prohibited by Ohio Senate Bill 1 may still appear in some places. However, all programs and activities are being administered in compliance with federal and state law.

Fertility Goals Workshop Series 2025-26

Fertility Goals Workshop Series 2025-26

Fertility Goals: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Impact for Science and Policy

Ohio Population Consortium Logo

Workshops sponsored by the Ohio Population Consortium
Organizers: John Casterline, Emeritus Professor, Ohio State University; Sarah Hayford, Robert T. Lazarus Professor, Ohio State University; and Wendy Manning, Dr. Howard E. and Penny Daum Aldrich Distinguished Professor, Bowling Green State University

Over the course of the twentieth century, fertility intentions, desires, preferences, and attitudes (fertility “goals”) became key constructs for demographic research on fertility. In high-fertility contexts, unwanted births and unmet need for contraception serve as a justification for intensifying family planning programs. In low-fertility contexts, desired fertility exceeds actual fertility, implying high prevalence of “unrealized fertility” and inspiring hope that appropriate policies can produce fertility rebound. In both contexts, the increasing focus in the past two decades on reproductive autonomy and reproductive justice centers women’s (and occasionally men’s) own desires and preferences as the foundational concern for policy and programmatic activity. Yet even as fertility goals have gained theoretical and policy importance, many questions remain around conceptualization and measurement of these constructs. We seek to explore the ways fertility goals have been defined and measured; how they have been used in scientific research and in policy applications; the challenges and limitations of these constructs, both theoretical and empirical; what we learn by analyzing fertility goals; and what is missed by centering individual fertility goals.

Spring 2025

The 2025 series of events included the two webinar below and a one-day in-person meeting in Washington, DC, on April 10, 2025 (in conjunction with the Population Association of America Annual Meeting).

Webinar 1: Conceptualization and Measurement of Fertility Goals

Thursday, February 27, 2025

12-1:30 pm, Eastern Standard Time (UTC-5)

Monika Mynarska, Institute of Psychology, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw
Corinne Rocca, Ob/Gyn and Reproductive Sciences, University of California-San Francisco
Elizabeth Sully, Guttmacher Institute

Webinar 2: What Fertility Goals Tell Us about Fertility Trends

Monday, March 24, 2025

12-1:30 pm, Eastern Daylight Time (UTC-4)

Éva Beaujouan and Shalini Singh, Department of Demography, University of Vienna
Karen Benjamin Guzzo, Department of Sociology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
Francis Obare Onyango, Population Council
 

Spring 2026

The continuation of this series will include the three webinars below.

Webinar 3: Contingency and Context of Goals for Having Children

Thursday, January 29, 2026

12-1:30 pm, Eastern Daylight Time (UTC-5)

Even in low-fertility countries, two children continues to be the modal response to survey questions about ideal, desired, or planned family size. From these observations, demographers have concluded that the two-child family is a powerful and stable ideal motivating decisions about childbearing. Yet increasing evidence questions the way this ideal is translated into specific choices. 

The “two-child family” norm is conditioned by other goals and constraints (including, but not limited to, partnership dynamics, career aspirations, and financial circumstances). Speakers in this webinar will reflect on what we know from survey data about how the ideal of the two-child family is related to other financial and family goals; how gender ideologies of work and family shape the desired number of children; and how lived experiences of family planning, pregnancy, and childbirth may shape prospective childbearing desires.

Presenters:

Julia Behrman, Department of Sociology, Northwestern University

Eunsil Oh, Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Emily Mann, Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior & Department of Women’s and Gender Studies, University of South Carolina

REGISTER FOR WEBINAR 3

Webinar 4: The New Wave of SRH Indicators: Where Do Fertility Goals Fit In?

Thursday, February 12, 2026

12-1:30 pm, Eastern Daylight Time (UTC-5)

There has been a recent surge of efforts to develop new indicators of sexual and reproductive health, indicators intended to supplant the constructs “unmet need for contraception” and “demand satisfied” that have served as featured indicators during the past two decades. 

The proposed indicators reflect an effort to achieve a more woman-centered approach to both SRH science and policy. Fertility goals were essential ingredients of the past indicators. Where do they fit in now? Have they been sidelined (deliberately or unintentionally)? If so, is this defensible and desirable, from both a scientific and policy perspective? 

The aim of this webinar is to have an energetic exchange about these (and related) questions.

Presenters:

John Casterline, Institute for Population Research, The Ohio State University

Nurudeen Alhassan, AFIDEP, Lilongwe, Malawi

Jamaica Corker, External Research Affiliate, Center for Studies in Demography & Ecology, University of Washington

Leigh Senderowicz, Department of Gender & Women’s Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison

REGISTER FOR WEBINAR 4

Webinar 5: The Relational Context of Fertility Goals

Wednesday, March 25, 2026

11-12:30 pm, Eastern Daylight Time (UTC-4)

Details to be announced.

REGISTER FOR WEBINAR 5